IELTS Task 2 Writing model answer 36
All of the model answers on this site are guaranteed band 9
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
In many countries, government sponsorship of the arts costs millions in taxpayers’ money. There are many more important things to spend money on.
Do you agree or disagree?Advertisement
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
There are some who claim that it is important to maintain the arts and an equal number of people who are opposed to continued government funding. This essay will argue in favour of the latter point for a number of reasons.Advertisement
The strongest point is that money spent on the arts could have been used for considerably more vital purposes. While the arts are important to a country’s identity, it must also be given that a nation’s health and wellbeing should be paramount. To illustrate, the idea that elderly people are forced to wait for essential operations whilst the money required to increase available medical provision is spent on opera and ballet is plainly immoral.Advertisement
In addition to health concerns, there are also more deserving social causes for the money that should be considered before the arts. Homelessness, unemployment, education levels and the crime rate are just some of the issues which deserve to be addressed before money is spent on what is essentially little more than entertainment.
A third factor is that some people have no interest in preserving or funding the arts, feeling that they have little practical value. If the arts are so much in need of sponsorship, then perhaps this is a reflection of their lack of popularity, in which case they should not be supported. The money could go to more popular events instead.
For each of these reasons, it can be concluded that there is little reason to continue funding the arts. Yet perhaps a compromise could be reached by which those keen to maintain the arts could raise a percentage of their own funds and the government could reduce its level of sponsorship